REVIEWS
3.0
52%
Recommended
30 Reviews
Steve
Good product I have 5 pairs of these pants I prefer the AP active over the AP regular
DCC
Didn't realize the pant was "active"... so, there's more stretch, but they're thin and not as warm as the AP pant I already have... also, the fit is different... the AP pant has a shorter rise, so they don't "sag" in the crotch as much and also the pocket detail is different, the pocket opens flat to the belt line vs at an angle which makes it harder to get your hand into... overall, way more happy with the original AP pant than the active version
nop
Front pockets are terrible, way too short. Regular length fits like a 30" inseam so they show mad ankle. Knife pocket and seams ruins the front silhouette. A shame since the fabric is great, good flex and durability
pantman
Liked the pants. 32 too short, 34 too long, overall kinda baggy fit
Snomanmn
As a fan of the original AP pant, I wanted to share that the AP active pant definitely runs smaller. The AP active is smaller in the waist, the legs are shorter and slimmer. Also, these don't have the button-up cuff. The material feels, and is, more synthetic (no cotton in the fabric blend).
Read All Reviews (30)
*Online only. First-time subscribers only. Returning subscribers will be resubscribed for marketing/promo emails.
*Online only. First-time subscribers only. Returning subscribers will be resubscribed for marketing/promo emails.
© 2025 Public Lands
If you are using a screen reader or other assistive technology and are having problems using this website, or if you have any other difficulties accessing this website, please call 1-844-890-0896 for assistance
*Donations are based on purchase price, excluding taxes or other charges. The Public Lands Fund is a program of the DICK’S Sporting Goods Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charity. Learn more at publiclandsfund.org.